Omblog.net
Blog Home
By Month
Recent Entries

email omblog.net
Here are some links that we like:

DailyKos
Vox
Talking Points Memo
Huffington Post
EgbertoWillies.com
David Pakman
Bill Moyers Today
TYT Network
The Contributor
Sam Sedar
Randi Rhodes Blog
Oliver Willis
Amanda Marcotte
Hullabaloo
Ezra Klein
Kevin Drum
Atrios
Paul Krugman
Dean Baker
Robert Reich
BradBlog
Cliff Schector
Bob Cesca
Matthew Yglesias
John Cole
Firedoglake
BAGnewNotes
Juan Cole
Talk To Action
Bartholomew 's Notes
Things You Wouldn't Know...
Firedup Missouri
Show Me Progress
The Authoritarians
ThinkProgress
Campus Progress
Center for American Progress
Crooks and Liars :
Media Matters
FAIR Blog


Truthout
BuzzFlash.com
TheNation
AlterNet
News Hounds
Liberal Oasis
The Raw Story
American Rights at Work



Blog Home : December 2013 : 2013-12-09 to 2013-12-15

Founding Fathers’ Words Reveal 2nd Amendment Was... To Preserve Slavery?

By Nathaniel Downes

By 1755, the Militia was established not only as a foundation to enforce slavery in the south, but it was a structure which it could be expanded if need be. Countless records of captured free people of color, even people such as the Irish, were pressed as slaves under the system.

With the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, there was concern among slave holders that their militias, their slave patrols, would be usurped by the new federal government using the provisions outlined in Article 1, Section 8. Patrick Henry in particular was quite vocal on the subject, saying:

Let me here call your attention to that part [Article 1, Section 8 of the proposed Constitution] which gives the Congress power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States. . .

By this, sir, you see that their control over our last and best defence is unlimited. If they neglect or refuse to discipline or arm our militia, they will be useless: the states can do neither . . . this power being exclusively given to Congress. The power of appointing officers over men not disciplined or armed is ridiculous; so that this pretended little remains of power left to the states may, at the pleasure of Congress, be rendered nugatory. [Source]

He also is quoted as saying:

If the country be invaded, a state may go to war, but cannot suppress [slave] insurrections. If there should happen an insurrection of slaves, the country cannot be said to be invaded. They cannot, therefore, suppress it without the interposition of Congress . . . . Congress, and Congress only, can call forth the militia.

(Go to URL for more.)

2013-11-04 to 2013-11-10 «